Femi Falana (SAN), petitioned the International Criminal Court (ICC)
last week over the widespread corruption in the Goodluck Jonathan
administration.Read full text of the petition below:We are a firm of civil rights lawyers based in Lagos, Nigeria. We are
the defence counsel for the majority of the members of the Armed Forces
of the Republic of Nigeria who were charged with mutiny, cowardly
behavior and sundry offences before the courts-martial instituted by the
former military authorities.As we shall demonstrate anon, the only “offence” proved against our
clients in the military courts was that they had the temerity to demand
for weapons to fight the well equipped troops of the Boko Haram sect.On account of the deliberate refusal of the former military authorities
to equip and motivate the members of the armed forces involved in combat
operations the insurgents have killed about 25,000 soldiers and
civilians including children and displaced over 2,000,000 people. Having
compromised the security of the people of Nigeria by collaborating with
the terrorists the former military authorities deliberately encouraged
the brutal killing of innocent people including ill-equipped officers
and soldiers.During a visit to Borno state in 2014, former President Jonathan
revealed to some selected leaders of the community that it was when
Alhaji Modu Ali Sheriff caused the extra judicial killing of the leader
of the Boko Haram sect, Mohammed Yusuf that the group declared war on
the Nigerian people. Even though President Jonathan knew that Alhaji
Sheriff was a major sponsor of the terrorist group the government did
not charge him to court under the Terrorism Act applicable in Nigeria.
In order to divert the attention of the Nigerian people and the
international community from the afore mentioned crimes against
humanity, scores of soldiers were put on trial before courts-martial for
demanding for equipment to fight the well-armed members of the Boko
Haram sect.The military courts convicted the soldiers and sentenced them to various
terms of imprisonment while 70 were sentenced to death. Over 3,000
others were dismissed from the Nigerian Army in similar circumstances. Having investigated and confirmed that the said soldiers were sacrificed
to cover up the criminal negligence of the former military authorities
the current Army leadership has ordered the recall and reinstatement of
the 3,000 dismissed soldiers and commuted the death sentence of 66 out
of 70 convicts on death row to 10 years’ imprisonment.The inquiry conducted by the Presidential Panel on arms procurement has
established that the bulk of the sum of $2.1 billion and N643 billion
($4 billion) earmarked for the purchase of military hardware to fight
terrorism was criminally diverted by the former government through the
office of the National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki (rtd). It has
also been confirmed that the said Col. Dasuki colluded with some
serving and retired military officers and civilians to divert the sum of
$2 billion and N29 billion set aside for the procurement of fighter
jets and other equipment for the Nigeria Air Force. As if that was not
enough, the sum of $322 million and £5.5 million from the Abacha loot
which was illegally transferred to Col. Dasuki by a former Finance
Minister, Dr. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala for prosecuting the war on terror has
also been criminally diverted. Part of the stolen fund was used to fund
the campaign for the re-election of President Goodluck Jonathan in the
2015 general election.Apart from diverting the fund for acquiring military equipment some
corrupt public officers also stole money set aside for acquiring the
necessary gadgets and equipment for securing the Nigerian people. For
instance, the $470 million contract awarded in 2009 for the installation
of CCTV cameras in Abuja, the seat of the federal government, was
poorly executed due to corrupt practices. Thus, the identification of
terrorists who launched bomb attacks in public places in Abuja has been
frustrated by the government officials who stole the contract sum.
Notwithstanding the deliberate refusal of the military authorities to
purchase arms and armament due to the criminal diversion of the security
fund, Col. Dasuki gave a lecture at Chatham House in London on February
8, 2015 where he claimed that Nigeria had acquired adequate equipment
to prosecute the war on terror. At the time he was addressing his London
audience Col Dasuki was well aware that the fund for procurement of
weapons had been stolen by himself and his cohorts.However, out of the fear that he could be made to account for his role
in the diversion of the security fund the then Chief of Defence Staff,
Air Marshal Barde disclosed, while he was retiring from the service on
July 30, 2015, that the armed forces led by him lacked the equipment to
fight the terrorists. In his reaction to the disclosure Col. Dasuki
stated sometime in August 2015 that the equipment ordered by the
Jonathan administration had not arrived the country! It is submitted
that the former public officials, serving and military officers as well
as civilian collaborators who engaged in the criminal diversion of the
security fund are liable to bear full responsibility for the death of
about 25,000 people who were killed by the Boko Haram sect and the over
2,000,000 people displaced by the terrorist organisation. Nigeria is a
state party to the Rome Statute and deposited its instrument of
ratification on 27 September 2001.The preamble to the 2003 United Nations Convention against Corruption
(UNCAC), which Nigeria has also ratified states that corruption “is no
longer a local matter but a transnational phenomenon that affects all
societies and economies. We strongly believe that allegations of
corruption so far made against Col. Sambo Dasuki and other public
officers have had catastrophic effects on the lives of over 25,000
Nigerian soldiers and civilians including children akin to crimes
against humanity as contemplated under the Rome Statute and within the
jurisdiction of the Court. The Rome Statute in article 7 defines “crime
against humanity” to include “inhumane acts causing great suffering or
injury,” committed in a widespread or systematic manner against a
civilian population.”The common denominator of crimes against humanity is that they are grave
affronts to human security and dignity. We believe that the staggering
amount of public funds alleged to have been stolen create just these
consequences. Crimes against humanity are not only physical violence;
allegations of corruption highlighted above hold a comparable gravity,
which the Prosecutor should examine and thoroughly investigate. The
elements that need to be established to prove a “crime against humanity
“under article 7(1)(k) of the Rome Statute are that, the perpetrator
inflicted great suffering or serious injury by means of an inhumane act;
that the perpetrator was aware of the circumstances, and that the act
was committed within a widespread or systematic attack on a civilian
population; and that the perpetrator knew of that link. The consequences
of allegations of corruption highlighted above are similar to those of
the offences in article 7(1). Corrupt officials in the government know
well that their conduct is criminal and injurious, and that their
ostentatious lives, built on a radical breach of solemn trust, aggravate
their crime against humanity.We believe that these allegations of widespread and systematic
corruption amount to crimes against humanity and therefore clear
violations of the provisions of the Rome Statute of International
Criminal Court. These allegations have given rise to individual criminal
responsibility of those suspected of perpetrating corruption, as
entrenched in the Rome Statute. Although the government of President
Muhammadu Buhari has so far shown some political will to fight
corruption and recover stolen assets, we believe that an international
investigation by the ICC from the perspective of crimes against humanity
would complement the anti-corruption initiatives by the current
government and contribute to ending a culture of impunity of
perpetrators. We submit that substantial grounds exist to warrant the
intervention of the Prosecutor in this case.Under Article 30(2)(b) of the Rome Statute, a person has intent “in
relation to a consequence, [where] that person means to cause that
consequence or is aware that it will occur in the ordinary course of
events. We therefore submit that this is sufficient to hold Col Dasuki
and others that have been indicted in the arms theft scandal responsible
for crimes against humanity perpetrated against Nigerians.The failure of a former Finance Minister, Dr Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala to
prevent widespread and systematic corruption including the re-looting of
the Abacha loot amounts to complicity under the Rome Statute, and
therefore fits the legal requirements of a crime against humanity.
Falana then asked the ICC Prosecutor to: Urgently commence an
investigation proprio motu on the allegations of the criminal diversion
of the security fund of $2.1 billion and N643 billion earmarked by
suspected perpetrators, with a view to determining whether these amount
to crimes against humanity within the court’s jurisdiction. In this
respect, I also urge you to invite representatives of the Nigerian
government to provide written or oral testimony at the seat of the
Court, so that the Prosecutor is able to conclude on the basis of
available information whether there is a reasonable basis for an
investigation, and to submit a request to the Pre-Trial Chamber for
authorization of an investigation.Bring to justice those suspected to bear full responsibility for
deliberate under funding of the armed forces through widespread and
systematic corruption in Nigeria; and Urge the Nigerian government to
fulfil its obligations under the Rome Statute to cooperate with the ICC;
including complying with your requests to arrest and surrender
suspected perpetrators of the criminal diversion of security fund,
testimony, and provide other support to the ICC.SOURCE: THE WHISTLE
No comments:
Post a Comment